Education / KidsSoft paywall · trial optionalpaywall: pre signupquiz drivengoal settingsocial proof heavyannual default with trialfeature listpricing anchor strikethrough
123Opens on awards laurels and '#1 interactive app for kids.' The buyer here is the parent, not the kid, so leading with Oxford and Kidscreen badges talks to the adult deciding whether to trust the app with their child.45A 'kids learn 3x more words with Lingokids Plus' stat right before the paywall. It frames the subscription as measurable learning instead of entertainment, which is what a parent is paying for. I'd want to know where the number comes from, but for setting up the next screen it works.6The first paywall fires before any personalization or a single game. Monthly default at $15.99 with a free week. Asking this early leans on the parent's intent at install rather than value they've felt. I'd test running the 2-question quiz first so the ask lands after they've seen it personalize.7891011The 'parents only, enter your year of birth' gate. Standard kids-app move to keep children out of purchase and settings, and COPPA-friendly. It also quietly confirms an adult is the one looking at the paywall.1213141517Notification permission and the new/existing account choice both fire here. The system prompt has no primer in front of it, so they're spending the one notification ask with no benefit framing. A line like 'we'll send your kid's progress updates' before the prompt would lift the allow rate.1819Two paths: 'Personalize my kid's playtime' or 'Play now.' The skip-to-play option respects parents who just want the kid occupied, but it lets people bypass the personalization that makes the later paywall relevant. I'd track how many take Play now and whether they convert worse.20Age of the kid, framed as 'we'll show them the most exciting games for their age.' The question is sold as a benefit to the child, not data collection, and age is the single most useful input for content in a kids app.21Multi-select on focus areas, which is right since most parents want more than one. Good zero-party data. The miss is they never echo it back: the paywall after is generic, so 'you picked Math and Science, here's what Plus unlocks' is left on the table.22Now the paywall is annual at $74.99 with a free week, fired right after the quiz. Moving from the monthly-default opener to an annual default here is smart, since the quiz buys enough commitment to push the bigger plan. Awards laurels sit up top again for the parent.23242526Hit dismiss and you get a second offer: 'Lingokids Plus for free, 7 days.' It's the same free week reworded as a limited-time gift, not an actual discount. Most people don't buy on the first paywall, so a softer re-ask catches some. I'd test making this one genuinely different, like a longer trial, since repeating the same offer reads as pushy.272930The structured paywall: yearly highlighted with a 61% off badge, $191.88 struck through to $74.99 ($6.25/month), monthly below at $15.99. Anchoring the annual against the monthly run-rate makes $6.25 feel small. Both plans carry a free week, so the choice is plan size, not whether to trial.31Account creation lands here, after the kid has played and the quiz is done, framed as 'sign up to get progress updates' rather than 'create an account.' Pushing signup this deep cuts dropout, and tying it to a parent benefit (their achievements, tips) gives a reason to hand over the email.32333435From here the 'Save 61%' paywall rides on top of the actual content: addition games, a space quest, screen time controls, progress reports, downloads. Each locked screen shows the specific thing Plus unlocks, so the ask is attached to a feature the parent just reached instead of a generic wall.36373839404142434445464748495051
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
